If Christopher Stevens Was Concerned About al Qaeda Hit Why Did He Keep His Security At Bay?

Halloween Party 2001
50 Days After 9/11
 
 
 
Who's lying?

We have been told that the Ambassador had a habit rejecting increased security for himself.

Everyone claims that the Ambassador wanted to be near his Muslim people and any show of security would keep his people away.

Everyone knows that there was no security at the consulate on September 11th because the Muslims won, and the Ambassador lost.

If he was so concerned for his safety then he would have left Benghazi, or requested more security. He did neither.

So now CNN makes it sound as if Stevens was concerned about his security, of course the source for this information is unnamed.
In the months leading up to his death, U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, worried about what he called the never-ending security threats in Benghazi and mentioned his name was on an al Qaeda hit list, a source familiar with his thinking told CNN.
So now the story is that the Ambassador was concerned for his safety for months? It has been less than 1 year when Qaddafi was murdered by the men Stevens put into power, and it has been about ten months since the Ambassador landed in Benghazi. So let me get this straight? The Ambassador lands in Benghazi in November of 2011 refusing all security and still has no security around him at his death, and yet we are told that somehow the Ambassador was frighten for his life? Bullshit!

Actions speak louder than words, the actions of Stevens tell us that he was not concerned for his safety or the safety of his staff.

Secretary of State Clinton & Ambassador Stevens  


Even Secretary of State Hilary Clinton said today that there is no evidence that Ambassador Stevens was on any al Qaeda hit list. He was not a target. He was not at risk.

Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee said that: “It's pretty obvious Stevens did not have adequate security,”  - it is because Stevens did not ask for any nor did he want any - he had an open door policy, tight security would close the door.

So we have someone on the left and someone on the right that acknowledge that Stevens did not have any security because he did not feel threaten - CNN is lying.

 

Comments

Popular Posts