Did Any Of Archbishop Bergoglio's Priests Molest Those They Were Required Live With In The Slums of Buenos Aires? The Answer Is Yes & Then Some!

Where's Father?
Archbishop Bergoglio required parish priests to live with their people, and in the same conditions as their people, even in radical simplicity and poverty. This, he argued, is necessary for the pedagogy of the gospel, and the mediating role of the priest. It recalls the witness of the early mendicant orders in the face of a world hostile to the gospel. First Things
The following was published 23 April 2013: Did Any Of Archbishop Bergoglio's Priests Molest Those They Were Required Live With In The Slums of Buenos Aires?  

The question was asked but I didn't read the answer until recently on Mundabor's Blog the answer was written on his blog by an unidentified person. The answer is below. Is it true? Probably

Read this from 2013:

If it was easy to rape boys at the church or in the rectory - how easier would it have been to rape a boy sleeping in the same room with a slum priest?

The future pope commanded  his priests to leave the church and live in the slums? Not in the Church near Jesus Christ Crucified? But live in the slums of Buenos Aires!

So slum priests of Bergoglio are never tempted? Are they super men that can lay down next to boys and not be tempted? Maybe Bergoglio did not know about the homo priest scandal of rapping little boys?

This needs full investigation.

"He was always part of our slum"

Because from what I gather the old proverb says something to the effect that:
Can a man hide fire in his bosom, and his garments not burn? prov.vi.xxvii.
or  from a little pagan story:
One winter a Farmer found a Snake stiff and frozen with cold. He had compassion on it, and taking it up, placed it in his bosom. The Snake was quickly revived by the warmth, and resuming its natural instincts, bit its benefactor, inflicting on him a mortal wound. "Oh," cried the Farmer with his last breath, "I am rightly served for pitying a scoundrel."Aesop's Fables
Not saying that the residents of the slums of Buenos Aires are all snakes - just saying that a man who takes the vow of celibacy and places himself near the occasion of sin will eventually get burned. It's like a layman testing his purity and fidelity to his wife by spending hours in a strip club. "See honey I still love you!"

So why did Bergoglio demand that his priests go live with the slum dwellers?

Did Bergoglio not know the dangers of placing priests among those slum dwellers?

Did not Bergoglio know the dangers?

There is an altar railing - and it's there for a reason! You stay on your side of the Altar railing & I will stay on my side!

Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born 17 Dec. 1936

Bergoglio was ordained a priest on 13 December 1969. Did he not know about homos at the seminary?

Bergoglio was the  Provincial Superior of the Society of Jesus in Argentina from 1973–1979. Did he not know about homos in the Jesuits?

Bergoglio was made Bishop 27 June 1992. Did he not know about the homo's in his diocese?

Bergoglio became a Cardinal on 21 February 2001 by John Paul II. Did he still not know about homo's even then?

So, O.K. maybe Bergoglio is naive and did not know that some priests are homos and just maybe Buenos Aires was free of the sin of homosexuality and maybe just maybe there were no homo priests in Buenos Aires.

That could explain his desire to remove his priests from the confines of the Church and let them wander the streets of Buenos Aires looking for the poor to live with.

Come Here Little Boy I Want To Live With You!

In this day and age do any of you think that everything was above board and that no priestly scandal took place in the slums with various under age boys or girls - no hint of a scandal at all?

Hey let you in on a secret - the poor can not hire attorneys to sue the church if indeed some were abused by the slum priests - so you ain't gonna know all about the abuse that took place by the slum priests because no one can sue and the media will not  get the word out.

And if it is true that there was no sin committed against the priestly vows of celibacy in the slums of Buenos Aires under the leadership of Bergoglio, then by all means listen to the man to find out how he was able to play with fire and not get burned!

We all wanna know how to handle the snake without getting bit!

The Answer:

This Francis fool was the perfect candidate to weaken Papacy to the point of irrelevance, I visited Argentina 2 years ago, when I was working for a russian news agency and visited some slums in Buenos Aires to cover the work of the “curas villeros” (slum priests) in the many shanty towns of the capital, I was shocked to see that practically all those priests had concubines and had sons with them, other were openly homosexual or had transexual partners and everyone knew about this!I talked with people from the slums and asked them what did they think about this? their answers were basically the same: “it’s ok, they love each other, they harm nobody” I also talked with more cultured (and minoritarian) sectors of the catholic church in Buenos Aires who were infuriated by the situation but they were unable to do anything about it, they said they were largely outnumbered by the “populist priests”.They also told me that all the high hierarchy of the church in Buenos Aires, Bergoglio included, were aware of the dubious morality of the slum priests, the argentine traditionalist catholics also told me that in those slums the priest is considered a “fairy godmother” by the poor people who live there, in fact the priests are to many of them the only “help” since the hypecorrupt state is practically absent, thus the priest is perceived as a ” good nanny” who feeds and takes care, so no one dares or bothers to question his life and morality, to slum people everything the priests do is ok as long as they keep supplying them with free stuff…. a doctrine of sterile assistentialism that leads nowhere, keeps the poor in poverty, the lazy in laziness and the sinner happy with his sins.Bergoglio has started to export this model of spiritual misery and moral decay to the rest of the world since he was elected and sadly he will continue vomiting the filthy populist nonsense that’s been coming out of argentina provincial, ultracorrupt politics for decades.

Pay Attention!

Demon Pazuzu
“In the year 1864, Lucifer together with a large number of demons will be unloosed from hell; they will put an end to faith little by little, even in those dedicated to God. They will blind them in such a way, that, unless they are blessed with a special grace, these people will take on the spirit of these angels of hell; several religious institutions will lose all faith and will lose many souls.Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
Francis The Destroyer

Comments

Popular Posts